Rights of Admission Reserved ...

It is that time of the year again! The parents of two and three somethings are tense- nursery school admissions are a hot topic.

There are those that have a son, a first born. They thanked the God above for a healthy child when he was born.He hears well, enjoys music, is entire in limb and sight- no disability. Or may be their elder child is a daughter who is in a girls' only convent school. They score ZERO for being a HEALTHY... ABLE... BOY... whose sibling is not in the same school. They are out of the race even before it started! They lose 40+ marks based on these 'transparent' criteria. And there would be quite a few like these. Where can these parents and these children go?

Many good schools are displaying notices- No seats available for nursery admissions. "House Full!" When you go for a rave movie and find this sign, you are disappointed but end up buying a ticket for the next available show. Or... you give in to that agent who is selling the tickets at a premium ( Black is a great movie but a politically incorrect word!). The current scenario of school admissions leaves the parents with little choice. They make the politically incorrect decision. Or would they much rather wait for the next show? Next year?

Has the number of children grown so dramatically that with the seats full in most good and medium grade schools, there still are a lot of children left high and dry without a seat to sit on? Where are the children who are filling the 'filled' seats?

There has to be an explanation. It has to be logical.

I am fortunate. I decided that my children MUST go to a school that is close to my house. It should be a reasonable school. Notice here that I am not saying reasonably good. Only reasonable. It should prepare my children for their life. I chose to send them to a school that is 5 minutes drive from our home. The children take about 15 minutes in the bus. I did not choose my own alma mater only because it was farther than this institution.

There are parents who want the school to be an announcement of their status. Agreed there would be schools that justify the snob value attached to their names. Is it this snob value or our own commitment as parents that is going to prepare our children for their future?

While the Ganguly Committee tried to put some sense into the system, it only ended up making the whole process more chaotic than ever before. The siblings should study together when possible. It makes sense to allocate additional marks for that. Where do, however, the first borns go? The differentiation between a girl and boy child is not an issue in a city like Delhi. It may still be important in villages. Allocating additional marks for a girl child seems very inappropriate. Where do boys go?

Special needs children have traditionally been educated by Special Educators in a few very good schools, including my own alma mater- Bharatiya Vidya Bhawan. What is more the department worked extra hard to include these special children in the mainstream. Unless a school has specially trained special educators allocating marks for special needs children will only set them back further. It will not promote inclusive education... only further alienation. Where do 'ordinary' children go?

Are there any solutions that can be just set out for babus to follow? Can we not lay down criteria which are fair and inclusive? Rather tahn exclusive and questionable?

We need to strengthen our system to INCLUDE more and more children to be educated... not EXCLUDE deserving children from the system. This might even promote a 'parallel' 'economy' and will seep into our system blackening the very water we spray the tiny saplings with.

2 comments:

Dyslexicon said...

I agree with the general diffulties faced and the apprehensions of the parents. BUt you must also look at the other aspect of this issue. 200 seats and > 2000 applicants, how does school decide between children who are equally innocent & deserving. There have to be some selection / rejection criteria - logical or absurd. However, most of the criteria adviced by Ganguly Committee appear to be quite logical (though they may not meet the expectation of all the parents):
1. Distance - gives the child more time, less tiring, better security and convenient for parents.
2. Sibling - it is more logical to have all your kids studying in same school. They bond well, its provided security & convenience.
4. Parents Education - If you have slogged hard all your life to achieve academic excellence then you deserve to have you children studying in a good school. You children too are likely to be bright and well deserving.
5. Parent being an Alumni - This is just an emotional criteria and not really logical.
6. Girl Child - Boys are as deserving to be educated as girls but if the choice is sending one to a farther school, I'd rather my son went to a fartehr school than my daughter - because of security reasons.

Anyways, no matter what the criteria, those who are selected will endorse them and those who have to face rejection will, obviously, criticize.
It would help if parents overcome their prejudices about school next door and their obsession about "Brands", etc.

Nature Walker said...

I am not contesting that the criteria are inappropriate- only that they have been implemented quite erratically. There are schools in secular India which are allocating 40 marks for belonging to a perticular community or religion or state.
As for favouring siblings, I am all for it- WHEN it is applicable. It should not be a disadvantage to be a first born, for instance.
As far as distance is concerned- your son will not get into a farther school! He will be denied admission.

The reeds that float… Nidhi Dhawan May 10, 2020 · 1 min read The reeds that float on the waves and get carried away are part of the flow tha...